Weight loss, in the context of medicine or health or physical fitness, is a reduction of the total body weight, due to a mean loss of fluid, body fat or adipose tissue and/or lean mass, namely bone mineral deposits, muscle, tendon and other connective tissue.
Weight Management
Diet Loss
Diet Supplements
Overweight Loss
Fat Burner
Diet Foods
Weight Control
Weight Loss Tips
Weight Loss Pills
Weight Loss Drugs
Weight Loss Products
Weight Loss Program
Partner
Page
External Link
External Link
External Link
External Link
External Link
|
Weight Loss Pill
Progestogen
Only Pills or Progestin Only Pills (POP) are contraceptive pills
that only contain synthetic progestogens (progestins) and do not
contain estrogen. They are colloquially known as mini pills.
Although such pills are sometimes called "Progesterone Only
Pills," they do not actually contain progesterone, but one of
several chemically related compounds and there are a number of
progestogen only contraceptive formulations.
Mechanism
of action
The mechanism of action of progestogen-only contraceptives
depends on the progestogen activity and dose.
Very low dose progestogen-only contraceptives, such as
traditional progestogen-only pills (and subdermal implants
Norplant and Jadelle and intrauterine systems Progestasert and
Mirena), inconsistently inhibit ovulation in ~50% of cycles and
rely mainly on their progestogenic effect of thickening the
cervical mucus and thereby reducing sperm viability and
penetration.
Intermediate dose progestogen-only contraceptives, such as the
progestogen-only pill Cerazette (or the subdermal implant
Implanon), allow some follicular development but much more
consistently inhibit ovulation in 97–99% of cycles. The same
cervical mucus changes occur as with very low dose progestogens.
High dose progestogen-only contraceptives, such as the
injectables Depo-Provera and Noristerat, completely inhibit
follicular development and ovulation. The same cervical mucus
changes occur as with very low dose and intermediate dose
progestogens.
In anovulatory cycles using progestogen-only contraceptives, the
endometrium is thin and atrophic. If the endometrium was also
thin and atrophic during an ovulatory cycle, this could
theoretically interfere with implantation of a blastocyst
(embryo).
Efficacy
The theoretical efficacy is similar to that of the combined oral
contraceptive pill (COCP). However, they are taken continuously
without any breaks between packets and traditional progestogen-only
pills must be taken to a much stricter time every day (within 3
hours vs. a COCP's 12 hours, although in some countries the POP
Cerazette has an approved window of 12 hours). The real-life
efficacy is therefore dependent upon compliance.
POPs are not dependent upon gut bacterial flora for their
absorption and so are not affected by courses of antibiotics.
They will, however, be affected by any episodes of diarrhea or
vomiting.
Benefits
Lacking the estrogen of combined pills, they are not associated
with increased risks of DVT or heart disease. With the decreased
clotting risk, they are not contraindicated in the setting of
sickle-cell disease. The progestin-only pill is recommended over
regular birth control pills for women who are breastfeeding
because the mini-pill does not affect milk production (estrogen
reduces the amount of breast milk). Like combined pills, the
minipill decreases the likelihood of pelvic inflammatory
disease.
It is unclear whether POPs provide protection against
endometrial cancer and ovarian cancer to the extent that COCP
do.
Side
effects
With no break in the dosage, flow does not initially occur at a
predictable time. Most women tend to establish, over a few
months, light spotting at approximately regular intervals.
May cause mastalgia (breast tenderness) or mood swings.
Weight gain is less commonly experienced than on COCP.
Breast
cancer risk
Epidemiological evidence on POPs and breast cancer risk is based
on much smaller populations of users and so is less conclusive
than that for COCPs.
In the largest (1996) reanalysis of previous studies of hormonal
contraceptives and breast cancer risk, less than 1% were POP
users. Current or recent POP users had a slightly increased
relative risk (RR 1.17) of breast cancer diagnosis that just
missed being statistically significant. The relative risk was
similar to that found for current or recent COCP users (RR
1.16), and as with COCPs, the increased relative risk decreased
over time after stopping, vanished after 10 years, and was
consistent with being due to earlier diagnosis or promoting the
growth of a preexisting cancer.
The most recent (1999) IARC evaluation of progestogen-only
hormonal contraceptives reviewed the 1996 reanalysis as well as
4 case-control studies of POP users included in the reanalysis.
They concluded that: "Overall, there was no evidence of an
increased risk of breast cancer" with progestogen-only
contraceptives, but since there was "inadequate evidence", they
were "possibly carcinogenic".
Recent anxieties about the contribution of progestogens to the
increased risk of breast cancer associated with HRT in
postmenopausal women such as found in the WHI trials[5] have not
yet spread to progestogen-only contraceptive use in
premenopausal women.
|