Weight loss, in the context of medicine or health or physical fitness, is a reduction of the total body weight, due to a mean loss of fluid, body fat or adipose tissue and/or lean mass, namely bone mineral deposits, muscle, tendon and other connective tissue.
Weight Management
Diet Loss
Diet Supplements
Overweight Loss
Fat Burner
Diet Foods
Weight Control
Weight Loss Tips
Weight Loss Pills
Weight Loss Drugs
Weight Loss Products
Weight Loss Program
Partner
Page
External Link
External Link
External Link
External Link
External Link
|
Weight
Loss Manegement
Low-carbohydrate
diets became a major weight loss and health maintenance trend
during the late 1990s and early 2000s. While their popularity
has waned recently from its peak, they still remain popular.
This diet trend has stirred major controversies in the medical
and nutritional sciences communities and, as yet, there is not a
general consensus on their efficacy or safety.
As of 2008 the majority of the medical community remains
generally opposed to these diets for long term health although
there has been a recent softening of this opposition by some
organizations.
This article summarizes a sampling of the studies and other
research that exist related to this diet trend including not
only the efficacy of these diets on weight loss, but also their
effects on other aspects of health and related topics such as
ketosis. This is not a complete listing of all relevant
research.
Synopsis
Because of the substantial controversy regarding
low-carbohydrate diets, and even disagreements in interpreting
the results of specific studies, it is currently difficult to
objectively summarize the research in a way that reflects
scientific consensus.
Although there has been some research done throughout the
twentieth century, most directly relevant scientific studies
have occurred in the 1990s and early 2000s and, as such, are
relatively new and the results are still debated in the medical
community.[16] Supporters and opponents of low-carbohydrate
diets frequently cite many articles (some times the same
articles) as supporting their positions. One of the fundamental
criticisms of those who advocate the low-carbohydrate diets has
been the lack of long-term studies evaluating their health
risks. This has begun to change as longer term studies are
emerging.
Specific
Research
The following is not a complete list of all relevant research
but a selected list of articles demonstrating some of the
breadth of scientific knowledge available on this subject.
Journal
of the American Medical Association: 1926
Lieb et al., 1926 conducted a case study of Dr. Vilhjalmur
Stefansson, an anthropologist and explorer who lived with the
Inuit eating a diet consisting almost entirely of meat, fish,
and fat. A research team studied Stefansson's health looking for
signs that his "unusual" diet had adversely affected his health.
The team was unable to find any health problems in Stefansson
and noted that the Inuit themselves also were quite healthy.
Journal
of Biological Chemistry: 1929
Tolstoi, 1929 performed a one-year study of two men who consumed
a diet of exclusively meat. One of the subjects demonstrated a
dramatic increase in cholesterol levels while the other actually
lowered his cholesterol levels by the end of the study. All
other health indicators were normal for both subjects.
Note that because of the magnitude of the reported increase (and
decrease following the test period) in the cholesterol levels,
the measurement methodology has to be questioned by modern
standards (i.e. the numbers may not directly correlate to modern
cholesterol measurement techniques).
The
Lancet: 1956
Kekwick and Pawan, 1956 conducted a study of subjects consuming
1000-calorie diets, some 90% protein, some 90% fat, and some 90%
carbohydrates. Those on the high fat diet lost the most, the
high protein dieters lost somewhat less, and the high
carbohydrate dieters actually gained weight on average.
Kekwick and Pawan noted irregularities in their study (patients
not fully complying with the parameters of the study). As such
the validity of the conclusions has to be questioned.
Annals of
Internal Medicine: 1965
A study conducted in 1965 at the Naval Hospital Oakland
(Oakland, California) used a diet of 1000 calories per day, high
in fat and limiting carbohydrates to 10 grams (40 calories)
daily. Over a ten-day period, subjects on this diet lost more
body fat than did a group who fasted completely (Benoit et. al.
1965). Some advocates, such as Atkins, of low-carbohydrate diets
have termed this the metabolic advantage of such diets.
Journal
of the American Dietetic Association: 1980
Larosa, 1980 followed 24 patients for 12 weeks, 8 weeks on a
high-protein, low-carbohydrate diet, studying their weight loss
and cholesterol changes. The authors concluded the following.
The high-protein, low-carbohydrate dieting resulted in
substantial weight loss ... Significant increases occurred in
LDL-cholesterol, uric acid, and free fatty acid levels. HDL-cholesterol
levels failed to rise despite significant weight loss ...
Despite weight loss the study found serious negative metabolic
changes.
American
Journal of Clinical Nutrition: 1997
Holt et al., 1997 performed a study of glucose and insulin
responses for test subjects to a variety of foods, both high-
and low-carbohydrate. The conclusions state the following.
Our study was undertaken to test the hypothesis that the
postprandial insulin response was not necessarily proportional
to the blood glucose response and that nutrients other than
carbohydrate influence the overall level of insulinemia ... The
results of this study confirm and also challenge some of our
basic assumptions about the relation between food intake and
insulinemia. Within each food group, there was a wide range of
insulin responses, despite similarities in nutrient composition
... As observed in previous studies, consumption of protein or
fat with carbohydrate increases insulin secretion compared with
the insulinogenic effect of these nutrients alone (22, 30-32)
... However, some protein and fat-rich foods (eggs, beef, fish,
lentils, cheese, cake, and doughnuts) induced as much insulin
secretion as did some carbohydrate-rich foods (eg, beef was
equal to brown rice and fish was equal to grain bread).
This study challenges the general assertion that only
carbohydrates significantly impact insulin production.
The authors describe their work as "preliminary" and so the
results should be judged with caution.
|